doctors-for-real-justice

doctors-for-real-justice:

takashi0:

hxccatholic:

howiespeaks:

maggieneel:

khenon:

Emboldened ISIS Barbarically Slaughtering Christians In Iraq as Obama Plays Golf

The Christian genocide taking place in the Middle East currently has reached alarming levels. Last week, the jihadist terrorist group ISIS, which means the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria – although it is unrecognized as a nation – took over Qaraqosh, the largest Christian town in Iraq, warning Christians to “leave, convert or die.” They are systematically beheading children. It is a part of an unprecedented, recent effort by the ISIS to extinguish Christians from northern Iraq. In 2003, there were about 1.5 million Christians in Iraq. After the Iraq War, that number dropped to as low as 200,000.

ISIS captured Mosul in June, so Christians there fled to Qaraqosh, population 50,000. ISIS warned Christians in Mosul to leave by July 19th. The houses of Christians in Mosul were painted with the letter “N,” meaning Nasare, the Muslim word for Christians, which comes from Nazareth, Jesus’s hometown. Their property was confiscated, including jewelry and wedding rings – sometimes chopping off their fingers to get them. Their churches were bombed, which has been caught on video. Catholic Online has compiled some of the more graphic photos of the barbaric, torturous executions. Many Christians were crucified due to the humiliation of Christ’s crucifixion. There are reportedly no Christians left in Mosul.

Within the past few months, ISIS has taken over Fallujah, Tikrit, and Tel Afar in northern Iraq. Composed of radical Sunni Muslims, ISIS is also terrorizing Shia and some Kurdish Muslims. Besides eradicating Christians, its goals include removing the Shia Muslim population. Next, it is going after certain Kurdish Muslims, marching toward Erbil, the Kurdish capital of Iraq.

"All I hear is silence,” says Father George, an Assyrian priest struggling to take care of 40 families that have registered at his church so far. “Where are the States? Where is the UN? Until now, they have done nothing!” This is all happening because the U.S. and others have backed away. If a Republican had been in the Oval Office instead of Obama, these killings would have been drastically halted.

Dick and Lynne Cheney wrote, “On a trip to the Middle East this spring, we heard a constant refrain in capitals from the Persian Gulf to Israel, ‘Can you please explain what your president is doing?’ ‘Why is he walking away?’ ‘Why is he so blithely sacrificing the hard fought gains you secured in Iraq?’ ‘Why is he abandoning your friends?’ ‘Why is he doing deals with your enemies?’”

Instead, in January, Obama joked about ISIS, analogizing it to a junior varsity basketball team. ISIS is considered the successor to al Qaeda, and it doesn’t appear to be any less bloodthirsty than al Qaeda. In fact, the opposite is true. Al Qaeda disavowed any ties with ISIS in February, citing its barbaric methods. As did al Qaeda, ISIS emerged from the Muslim Brotherhood. Its goal is to establish a totalitarian Islamic theocracy with sharia law, and remove all borders between Middle Eastern countries.

ISIS is very savvy with technology. Its social media capabilities have been described as “probably more sophisticated than [that of] most US companies.” It has more assets than any jihadist group in the world, with assets worth $2 billion. About three quarters of this was reportedly seized from capturing Mosul, much of it stolen from banks. Other income comes from extorting truck drivers and threatening to blow up businesses.

ISIS continues to capture and use weapons, including surface-to-air Stinger missiles, M198 Howitzers, DShK guns mounted on trucks, anti-aircraft guns, self-propelled guns and at least one Scud missile. In Mosul, it seized UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters and nuclear materials.

Finally, on Thursday, Obama authorized air strikes. At the same time, he said U.S. combat troops would not return. “As commander in chief, I will not allow the United States to be drawn into fighting another war in Iraq,” Obama said. Fortunately, several countries, including France, are allowing asylum to fleeing Christians and non-Sunni Muslims.

So much for Obama claiming he ended the war in Iraq and took out al Qaeda’s bin Laden. You can win the war thanks to your predecessors’ aggressive approach, but lose everything later by disengaging and sending the terrorists mixed messages.

This is the beginning of the end for Christians in the Middle East. Christians know it; the Bible predicts things will get worse for Christians and Jews toward the end times, not better. Andrew White, Anglican Vicar in Baghdad, said: “It looks as if the end could be very near” for Christians in Iraq.

The fact that ISIS cannot get along with Shia and some Kurdish Muslims speaks volumes. Christians get along with hundreds, if not thousands, of different denominations today without killing each other by the thousands. Radical Islam is a drastic threat today to Christians, Jews and other less radical Muslims, and until it can be contained, the brutality is just going to increase.

Where is America in all of this? Has our own moral relativism deadened us to the difference between good and evil, so that we no longer distinguish between them, and no longer respond? As it says in Lamentations 1:12, “Is it nothing to you, all you that pass by?” When Obama blithely pulled out of Iraq, refusing to give aid to the Kurds (who are now providing refuge for the “least of these” Christians), and left everything in the hands of an unpopular, weak Prime Minister Malaki, he left the minority Christians with no protection. A few air strikes will have little effect on a threat this serious. ISIS has become emboldened, and has specifically said it intends to continue conquering. Who will it torture and murder next, U.S. embassies in the Middle East? Adjoining European countries, precipitating the next World War?

Let me talk about this. ISIS is doing this to about EVERYONE who doesn’t support them. The leader has literally declared himself the Caliph, which technically means, if you recognize him as such, Muslims MUST fight for him. It’s fucked up and, until recently, Maliki wasn’t doing anything about it. This is the same Maliki who the US ~supported~ as prime minister, continued to support as his public approval fell to basically 0, and insiders advised the president against it. It’s terrifying because I went to a talk with a Commandant of the Marines who was present during the removal of American troops and all he really has to say about it was, “We had so much hope.” And this isn’t just in Iraq.
Here’s a great article just to realize how huge they really are.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5659239

Read it.

howiespeaks.com

where the hell are all the notes

Oh haven’t you heard?

Tumblr HATES Christians.

Because of how ridiculously America-centric they are and how ignorant they are of not only history, but what it’s like where Whites/Men/Christians AREN’T the oppressors.

The fact that Al Qaeda doesn’t even want to be associated with these people really tells you a lot.

-Mod Eleven

ughsocialjustice
doctors-for-real-justice:

greekgodsforsocialjustice:

the-bigender-bee:

greekgodsforsocialjustice:

the-bigender-bee:

greekgodsforsocialjustice:

yewnymph:

nativeamericannews:

Navajo Kindergartner Sent Home from School, Ordered to Cut His Hair
On Monday, a 5-year-old Native American boy was sent home on his first day of school and ordered to cut his hair short because it allegedly violated district policy, the boy’s mother said.The child, Malachi Wilson, an enrolled citizen of the Navajo Nation, had been looking forward to his first day of kindergarten at F.J. Young Elementary in Seminole, Texas.

I AM SEETHING.  FUCK THE CONTINUATION OF ASSIMILATION EFFORTS AND ASSAULT ON THE PHYSICAL, MENTAL, EMOTIONAL, AND SPIRITUAL WELL-BEING OF NATIVE AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLE. 
THIS COUNTRY HAS NO SHAME
NO CONSCIENCE
NO HISTORICAL BEARING
HAS AMERICA FORGOTTEN SO SOON?
THE TRAGEDY OF NATIVE CHILDREN FORCED TO LEAVE THEIR HOMES FOR RACIST BOARDING SCHOOLS?
WHERE THEIR HAIR WAS CUT? WHERE CHILDREN WERE BEATEN FOR SPEAKING THEIR MOTHER TONGUES? WHERE THEY WERE ABUSED AND FORCED TO HIDE THEIR CULTURE AS A WAY TO SURVIVE? 
NEVER FORGET. NEVER.

I never understood why it was okay for girls to have long hair in school, but not boys, and for boys to have short hair, but not girls.I don’t know a whole lot about Native Americans, but doesn’t the men having long hair hold a religious or sacred meaning? Or any of them having really long hair for that matter?~ Aphrodite

Oh my god this is fucking ridiculous what’s wrong with a dude with long hair do they think he’s gonna slap people with his ponytail or some shit

I wish I knew… Native Americans have BEAUTIFUL hair and for schools to have him make him cut his hair probably imposes on his religion and culture…. I’m saying probably because I don’t know a lot about Native Americans, but I think I read somewhere that having long hair has a very significant meaning.
~ Aphrodite

Even then, hair is hair. Why is it so important for boys to have short hair and girls to have long hair. What are the risks of a boy having long hair. Again, slapping somebody with his ponytail? Making girls jealous by how ridiculously fabulous his hair is?

I guess because schools think only women can have long hair and only men can have short hair. Even though all over the world it varies and men and women have both long and short hair. I’ll never understand it /:
~ Aphrodite

Ok, but this isn’t even legal anymore. The Supreme Court has ruled against regulating hair length in general (page 3),but especially in the case of religious freedoms being infringed upon (page 9). And that suit happened in Texas and the link is from Texas’s Association of School Boards. 
The kid was allowed to attend school. After they got the documentation telling them this was actually part of his beliefs, the school exempted him from that part of the dress code. But the fact that his gender would have made a difference in how he could wear his hair is still ridiculous. 
-Mod Eleven

doctors-for-real-justice:

greekgodsforsocialjustice:

the-bigender-bee:

greekgodsforsocialjustice:

the-bigender-bee:

greekgodsforsocialjustice:

yewnymph:

nativeamericannews:

Navajo Kindergartner Sent Home from School, Ordered to Cut His Hair

On Monday, a 5-year-old Native American boy was sent home on his first day of school and ordered to cut his hair short because it allegedly violated district policy, the boy’s mother said.
The child, Malachi Wilson, an enrolled citizen of the Navajo Nation, had been looking forward to his first day of kindergarten at F.J. Young Elementary in Seminole, Texas.

I AM SEETHING.  FUCK THE CONTINUATION OF ASSIMILATION EFFORTS AND ASSAULT ON THE PHYSICAL, MENTAL, EMOTIONAL, AND SPIRITUAL WELL-BEING OF NATIVE AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLE. 

THIS COUNTRY HAS NO SHAME

NO CONSCIENCE

NO HISTORICAL BEARING

HAS AMERICA FORGOTTEN SO SOON?

THE TRAGEDY OF NATIVE CHILDREN FORCED TO LEAVE THEIR HOMES FOR RACIST BOARDING SCHOOLS?

WHERE THEIR HAIR WAS CUT? WHERE CHILDREN WERE BEATEN FOR SPEAKING THEIR MOTHER TONGUES? WHERE THEY WERE ABUSED AND FORCED TO HIDE THEIR CULTURE AS A WAY TO SURVIVE? 

NEVER FORGET. NEVER.

I never understood why it was okay for girls to have long hair in school, but not boys, and for boys to have short hair, but not girls.


I don’t know a whole lot about Native Americans, but doesn’t the men having long hair hold a religious or sacred meaning? Or any of them having really long hair for that matter?

~ Aphrodite

Oh my god this is fucking ridiculous what’s wrong with a dude with long hair do they think he’s gonna slap people with his ponytail or some shit

I wish I knew… Native Americans have BEAUTIFUL hair and for schools to have him make him cut his hair probably imposes on his religion and culture…. I’m saying probably because I don’t know a lot about Native Americans, but I think I read somewhere that having long hair has a very significant meaning.

~ Aphrodite

Even then, hair is hair. Why is it so important for boys to have short hair and girls to have long hair. What are the risks of a boy having long hair. Again, slapping somebody with his ponytail? Making girls jealous by how ridiculously fabulous his hair is?

I guess because schools think only women can have long hair and only men can have short hair. Even though all over the world it varies and men and women have both long and short hair. I’ll never understand it /:

~ Aphrodite

Ok, but this isn’t even legal anymore. The Supreme Court has ruled against regulating hair length in general (page 3),but especially in the case of religious freedoms being infringed upon (page 9). And that suit happened in Texas and the link is from Texas’s Association of School Boards. 

The kid was allowed to attend school. After they got the documentation telling them this was actually part of his beliefs, the school exempted him from that part of the dress code. But the fact that his gender would have made a difference in how he could wear his hair is still ridiculous. 

-Mod Eleven

wellbehavedwomendomakehistory
wellbehavedwomendomakehistory:

msm45:

rangerofdiscord:

iainanddaleks:

rangerofdiscord:

iainanddaleks:

oodlyenough:

iainanddaleks:

oodlyenough:

theconfessionsofawhovian:

http://theconfessionsofawhovian.tumblr.com/

because he’s the showrunner right now and that inevitably means a lot of people are not going to like what you do and are going to be very critical
this has all happened before and will all happen again, etc

But RTD never got this much hate when he was show runner That may be because most people had only seen his who so they couldn’t hate it as they only had it

RTD got a goddamn fic written about him being murdered for being gay courtesy of Torchwood fandom

But no “fans’ stopped watch before his series had even started !He wasn’t bullied off twitter !He didn’t get online petitions making him leave !Women who worked with him weren’t called unintelligence idiots!

I honestly can’t believe you’re still saying we called the women who worked with him unintelligent idiots
In any case, if he doesn’t want people to attack him maybe he should stop being so sexist, queerphobic and racist, hm?

Well he’s not ! You’ve clearly not understood the point Karen Gillian says something like “I picked the costumes myself,moffat had nothing to do with them so he’s not sexist cous it was my choice” and the idiots will say “she’s a idiot, she’s not informed on what sexism actually is” Also watch the show because it’s very clear that moffat is none of theses things

-whistles- Look over here everybody, we’ve got a privileged male telling a woman that there is no sexism in a certain show. I have truly seen it all. 
I clearly did not misunderstand the point. I got the point. You’ll defend Moffat no matter what for some stupid reason I can’t understand. Maybe it’s because you’re British and can’t stand the fact that Doctor Who - one of Britain’s only claim to fame besides Harry Potter is problematic. 
And nobody has ever called Karen an idiot, you’re putting words in our mouths to make us look bad. Congratulations, you’re proving the lengths Moffat Stans will go to discredit us. 
We’re just saying she doesn’t know what sexism is/has never experienced it before. Are we calling her an idiot? No! You guys are saying we are. 
I have watched the show. Multiple times. It’s very clear that Moffat IS all of those things. 

"Maybe it’s because your British". Wow what a way to talk down to a person. What actually goes through your head when you say Moffat is sexist, racist etc Then you come out and say that!
Now I hate the direction Moffat has gone with the show, and I mean HATE IT. However all of what your saying is just completely untrue. The show is not sexist. Most of the sexist claims surround the character of Amy and how all she ever wants is a man and she’s a kissagram and her costumes and all that this season Moffat didn’t hire any female writers.
Firstly Just because Amy relies on men throughout the show doesn’t make her weak or any less of a character. She goes through a hell of a lot on her own and copes. She is kidnapped by Kovarian alone and is forced to go through childbirth and the abduction of her child alone. She then sacrifices the Life she has always wanted to give the man she loves a chance at what he wants when she finds out she can’t have Children. Those are incredible things to do and she isn’t phased by them. I just don’t understand how you think a character that can go through all that and still be kind and happy can show women in a bad light. From the start of the show she knows what she wants with her life and despite everything that happens she doesn’t let it stop her from getting it. Just because what she wants is to settle down and get married doesn’t make her any less strong. 
As for Moffat being racist and homophobic I have no idea where you can even get that from?

^^Well said, and I don’t even really care for Amy or Moffat. People need to stop shoving social justice tumblry-wumblry nonsense into a good show.

Also, why are all these feminists/SJWs screaming about sexism while always praising River or Irene Adler (she’s also Moffat, so it’s OK to mention her) for flaunting their sexuality but if someone does it in a different way they don’t approve of, only THAT is sexist? You guys don’t get to have it both ways. Either both things are wrong or neither are.

wellbehavedwomendomakehistory:

msm45:

rangerofdiscord:

iainanddaleks:

rangerofdiscord:

iainanddaleks:

oodlyenough:

iainanddaleks:

oodlyenough:

theconfessionsofawhovian:

http://theconfessionsofawhovian.tumblr.com/

because he’s the showrunner right now and that inevitably means a lot of people are not going to like what you do and are going to be very critical

this has all happened before and will all happen again, etc

But RTD never got this much hate when he was show runner
That may be because most people had only seen his who so they couldn’t hate it as they only had it

RTD got a goddamn fic written about him being murdered for being gay courtesy of Torchwood fandom

But no “fans’ stopped watch before his series had even started !
He wasn’t bullied off twitter !
He didn’t get online petitions making him leave !
Women who worked with him weren’t called unintelligence idiots!

I honestly can’t believe you’re still saying we called the women who worked with him unintelligent idiots

In any case, if he doesn’t want people to attack him maybe he should stop being so sexist, queerphobic and racist, hm?

Well he’s not !
You’ve clearly not understood the point
Karen Gillian says something like “I picked the costumes myself,moffat had nothing to do with them so he’s not sexist cous it was my choice” and the idiots will say “she’s a idiot, she’s not informed on what sexism actually is”
Also watch the show because it’s very clear that moffat is none of theses things

-whistles- Look over here everybody, we’ve got a privileged male telling a woman that there is no sexism in a certain show. I have truly seen it all. 

I clearly did not misunderstand the point. I got the point. You’ll defend Moffat no matter what for some stupid reason I can’t understand. Maybe it’s because you’re British and can’t stand the fact that Doctor Who - one of Britain’s only claim to fame besides Harry Potter is problematic. 

And nobody has ever called Karen an idiot, you’re putting words in our mouths to make us look bad. Congratulations, you’re proving the lengths Moffat Stans will go to discredit us. 

We’re just saying she doesn’t know what sexism is/has never experienced it before. Are we calling her an idiot? No! You guys are saying we are. 

I have watched the show. Multiple times. It’s very clear that Moffat IS all of those things. 

"Maybe it’s because your British". Wow what a way to talk down to a person. What actually goes through your head when you say Moffat is sexist, racist etc Then you come out and say that!

Now I hate the direction Moffat has gone with the show, and I mean HATE IT. However all of what your saying is just completely untrue. The show is not sexist. Most of the sexist claims surround the character of Amy and how all she ever wants is a man and she’s a kissagram and her costumes and all that this season Moffat didn’t hire any female writers.

Firstly Just because Amy relies on men throughout the show doesn’t make her weak or any less of a character. She goes through a hell of a lot on her own and copes. She is kidnapped by Kovarian alone and is forced to go through childbirth and the abduction of her child alone. She then sacrifices the Life she has always wanted to give the man she loves a chance at what he wants when she finds out she can’t have Children. Those are incredible things to do and she isn’t phased by them. I just don’t understand how you think a character that can go through all that and still be kind and happy can show women in a bad light. From the start of the show she knows what she wants with her life and despite everything that happens she doesn’t let it stop her from getting it. Just because what she wants is to settle down and get married doesn’t make her any less strong. 

As for Moffat being racist and homophobic I have no idea where you can even get that from?

^^Well said, and I don’t even really care for Amy or Moffat. People need to stop shoving social justice tumblry-wumblry nonsense into a good show.

Also, why are all these feminists/SJWs screaming about sexism while always praising River or Irene Adler (she’s also Moffat, so it’s OK to mention her) for flaunting their sexuality but if someone does it in a different way they don’t approve of, only THAT is sexist? You guys don’t get to have it both ways. Either both things are wrong or neither are.

jackmackerel

jackmackerel:

korellasan:

theaudientvoid:

jackmackerel:

korellasan:

jackmackerel:

Am I the only one who ships Tumblr/Reddit more than 4chan/Tumblr

I mean, Reddit is more like the opposite of Tumblr than 4chan is

threesome maybe?

add Something Awful to make it the ultimate four-way

SA is sort of like 4chan’s parent (2ch is the other parent), so…

incest maybe?

Did I say the ultimate four-way? I mean the perfect four-way.